These Colors Don’t Burn

over their hearts

It has been threatened ever since the Republican party took control of all three branches of government, but the full-frontal assault on the Bill of Rights has finally begun in earnest. I’m not talking about the legislative embarrassment called the U.S. Patriot Act, pushed by the Bush (be-afraid-be-very-afraid) administration and passed by legislators who would have read it, really, had they the time. I’m talking about a full-on constitutional amendment to abolish free-speech rights granted by the First Amendment, as passed by the House of Representatives on Wednesday. It looks as though, before long, the “physical desecration” of the Amrican flag will be a criminal offense.

There is no question that, absent a new constitutional amendment, flag burning is protected political speech under the First Amendment. Indeed, it is the very sort of political dissent that was so important to the founders of this country – the most basic of our political liberties and a cornerstone of our democratic institutions. As Justice William Brennan wrote in Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), which held that desecration of the flag was constitutionally protected speech, “If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.”

Nothing says “I have a grievance against the federal government” quite like a public flag roasting. It is simple, elegant, uncomplicated symbolism.

The only fools who insist the flag burning is not political speech are disingenuous jingoists like California Republican Randy “Duke” Cunningham, one of the sponsors of the amendment in the House. Says Cunningham, “There are 10,000 ways you can express yourself. You don’t need to desecrate the flag.” But even these chuckle-heads can’t possibly believe their own rhetoric; they simply don’t want you to criticize the government. Like any good post-Reagan-era conservative, Cunningham and his ilk understand that pushing an ideological agenda via increased governmental regulation is what the god-fearing voters want. Stop us before we sin again! Throw in a tax break for the wealthy and some well-targeted corporate welfare and you’ve got yourself a comprehensive domestic agenda.

While the Senate will still have to pass the measure in order to send the question to the states for ratification, there is plenty of reason to be concerned. Sure, the House has always been the lunatic fringe of our representative government; but senators may find it hard to do the right thing here. It is very difficult for our politicians to stand against jingoism at a time when the political culture of I’m-a-better-patriot-than-you is all the rage in Washington. Consider the idiotic weasel act of New York Senator, and presumptive 2008 presidential candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, when pressed on this subject: “As I have said in the past, I support federal legislation that would outlaw flag desecration, much like laws that currently prohibit the burning of crosses, but I don’t believe a constitutional amendment is the answer.” I guess they didn’t teach constitutional law when Senator Clinton was at Yale Law School; but most fourth graders know that the whole point of constitutionally guaranteed liberties, like the right of free political expression, is that they trump any state authoritarian action to the contrary, including legislation.

Count on it: flag burning is toast.

My objections to this abridgment of a fundamental constitutional right are not simply political; I find the Old Glory amendment aesthetically unfathomable. Desecration, it seems, is in the eye of the beholder.

Just imagine all the kitschy shit that’s adorned with the stars and bars. How tacky does flag-draped crap have to be before the Feds decide jail-time should be served? Would Peter Fonda’s chopper in Easy Rider have landed him in the clink? How about star spangled cocktail napkins? I doubt that the FBI G(string)-men will be breaking into the lingerie drawers of women who like to wear the flag over their… ummm… hearts. But somehow I think the current Justice Department might have a hard-on (so to speak) for the “Spank Me Red, White, and Blue” open-rear bikini briefs for men.

slap me

Imagine the rich body of Supreme Court jurisprudence that will develop to give the nation guidance as to what constitutes a patriotic undergarment expression and what sullies the good reputation of the flag.

I think we should give the numb-nuts congressmen a do-over on this one. To quote Justice Brennan again, “We do not consecrate the flag by punishing its desecration, for in doing so we dilute the freedom that this cherished emblem represents.”

1 Response to “These Colors Don’t Burn”

  1. 1 mbjesq 3 September 2008 at 12:25 pm

    2008 update: Here is a Photoshop special of GOP vice-presidential hopeful Sarah, putting country first! It may not be real, but it captures the essence of the nominee as the Republican machine would sell her to us: a patriotic hottie who loves to shoot things.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blasts from the Past

Man Up!
Man up you pussy!

... because the idiocy of manliness is an evergreen topic.


Talking Turkey
how to cook a perfect turkey in half the time

... because Canada and the US will celebrate their Thanksgiving holidays and, regrettably and preventably, not 1-cook-in-10 will serve a decent turkey.


Filial Piety Awareness Day
Kaki Tusler, Mother's Day Celebrant

... because everyday is Mother's Day.


America Dreaming Small
American Dream

... because the American Dream seems but a distant memory, given the country's dominant ethos of small-mindedness.


Serenity and Gratitude to Bring in the New Year
New Year's Eve at Tibetan Pavillion

... to remind us that not every mix of Tibetans and Western spiritual seekers has to be nauseating.


Incredible Vision
Infinite Vision

... to celebrate the new edition of Infinite Vision published in India.


Expelliarmus! Harry Potter and the Path to Gandhian Nonviolence
Expelliarmus, Potter, Gandhi, Nonviolence

... reprised because military strategy seems more cruel and less effective than ever -- and certainly there is a better way.


India Going Nowhere Fast
Nano in Flames

... because cars are ruining Pondicherry, where I live. How badly are they fucking up your Indian town?


Understanding the Gift Economy
Gift Economy Explained

... reprinted because more-and-more people seem want to understand the gift economy. (Yeah!)

Join the Banter!

At its most fun, memestream is a dialogue -- or, better, a cacophony -- rather than a library of overwrought essays reflecting a single point of view. For that, we need your two cents!

If you read anything on memestream that provokes an interesting thought, an emotion, a laugh, violent disagreement, passionate agreement, an anecdote, an uncontrollable non sequitur... be sure to leave a comment.

It will be no surprise to anyone who follows this blog that "all the best stuff" resides in the readers' comments. So don't stop reading when you hit the end of the essays. And add your voice to the discussion!

Enter your email address to follow memestream and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 56 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 373,783 hits

%d bloggers like this: